On 9/23/20 3:21 PM, Dudemanguy via artix-general wrote:
> On 9/20/20 6:46 PM, Javier via artix-general wrote:
>> I did it already, with same results. The gremlins version kept being 1.0.4.1-3, but the package was different, since pacman complained, requesting to remove the old cached package. But no luck,
>
> Apologies for the delay, but did 1.0.4.1-1 work fine on this laptop?
> I did discover one possible difference in the PKGBUILD that may be
> related (using mv instead of cp -a). Hopefully that will fix it for
> you since otherwise there isn't any difference between 1.0.4.1-1 and
> 1.0.4.1-3 when it comes to installing the binaries. I updated the
> gremlins package (no version change again) so give it a reinstall and
> hope for the best...
Did you just upload it? I might need to wait for it, since I didn't get any pacman message about package corrupted, or anything like that, which should happen if the package (same version) changes... BTW, I don't know about 1.0.4.1-1, I'll have to get it from an archive repo.
Greetings !
--
Javier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20200923/aeccc133/attachment.sig>
More information about the artix-general
mailing list