On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:13:01PM -0400, Chris Cromer wrote:
> That is not really within the scope of this project. We follow arch
> linux, and arch linux is a glibc distro. To be able to offer musl
> would require recompiling 100% of the packages against musl and
> honestly that is a giant task and far beyond anything we have the
> manpower to do.
>
> Would it be cool? Yes. Is it doable? No.
What would we get with using Musl?
>
> On 4/23/21 8:25 AM, Delta Echo wrote:
> >Is there any interest in making Musl the systems libc?
> >
>
> --
> Chris Cromer
> Artix Developer
[-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
> --
> artix-general mailing list
> artix-general at artixlinux.org
> https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
http://www.brooklyn-living.com
Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and extermination camps,
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013
More information about the artix-general
mailing list