<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> Hi Javier, It's named thunderbird-artix as indeed when named thunderbird the order of included repo's in pacman.conf would determine which one would be installed, which might lead to confusion and issues. One of the reasons to provide thunderbird-artix is that it's critical that any security issues in an email client are fixed asap, but Arch's updates of Thunderbird are almost always weeks behind. Thunderbird-artix is available within a day of a new Thunderbird release. Also, the api integrations for ie. location services for Google and Mozilla have been disabled, as well as crashreporter and updater, and jack audio is enabled. Thx for the hint about octopus, which seems interesting. Regards, artist <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/17/21 11:50 PM, Javier wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:d057905b-c505-4bb0-bd00-01db77ca5cde@e.email">Hello ! I noticed universe has a "thunderbird-artix", and I'm wondering why named "-artix" instead of plain "thunderbird", in which case if "universe" is included in pacman.conf before arch repos, then the universe thunderbird package would be installed, rather than the arch one... Something else I'm wondering is what are the main differences. By looking at [1] vs [2], I can't notice much difference, except by some dependencies... Unfortunately, on [3] (the thunderbird-artix gitea), I only see the PKGBUILD available as to asses differences on the mozconfig.cfg build options... Perhaps someone can tell. Conveniently enough arch offers language packages for TB, but TB can manage installing them any ways, so not a must... BTW, It would be nice if artix version integrated octupus [4] on its build, but looking at the PKGBUILD only, it doesn't seem it does. I 1st heard about it from arch-general mailing list [5][6]. That would add great value I believe. Thanks ! <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> </body> </html>