Thx for reporting.
It seems this pkg fell through the cracks during the universe to galaxy
repo migration.
Problem has been fixed.
artist
On 5/2/25 03:44, Javier wrote:
> Hello !
>
> With a recent artix upgrade, libxml2 moved from 2.13.8-1 to 2.14.2-2:
>
>> upgraded libxml2 (2.13.8-1 -> 2.14.2-2)
>
> As a consequence, software depending on libxml2 should have been
> re-built at least, given libxml2 doesn't offer even the same sonames:
>
>> % ls -l /usr/lib/libxml2.*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 27 11:05 /usr/lib/libxml2.so ->
>> libxml2.so.16*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Apr 27 11:05 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.16 ->
>> libxml2.so.16.0.2*
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.3M Apr 27 11:05 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.16.0.2*
>
> If you notice, libxml2.so.2 is no longer available. Now, it so
> happens automount from galaxy autofs stopped working:
>> automount: error while loading shared libraries: libxml2.so.2: cannot
>> open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> One really quick work around, which works but doesn't seem the right one:
>
>> cd /usr/lib/
>> ln -s libxml2.so libxml2.so.2
>
> So with it:
>
>> % ls -l /usr/lib/libxml2.*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 27 11:05 /usr/lib/libxml2.so ->
>> libxml2.so.16*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Apr 27 11:05 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.16 ->
>> libxml2.so.16.0.2*
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.3M Apr 27 11:05 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.16.0.2*
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Apr 30 23:04 /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2 ->
>> /usr/lib/libxml2.so*
>
> And guess what, with it the current "galaxy/autofs 5.1.7-1" works. I
> looked at the AUR current version which is "5.1.9-5", so it seems the
> galaxy autofs could get not just a necessary re-build, but also an
> upgrade.
>
> The AUR package without tweaks fails to build given the lack of
> systemd because it's build with systemd in mind. I guess tweaking the
> package to not build for/with systemd is not that complex. From [1] it
> seems it's about removing "--with-systemd" from the "./configure"
> script args. However I looked on [2] for autofs and didn't find it
> there to see how it was built on galaxy.
>
> That said, it seems the initial work around mentioned is good enough,
> and I just wanted to point out the package requires re-build and
> upgrade, :)
>
> Thanks !
>
More information about the artix-general
mailing list