[artix-general] any recommended ISO for a 32bit

ALFONSO CAPILLA RODRIGUEZ ing.capilla at comunidad.unam.mx
Tue Jan 28 03:39:19 CET 2025


Thanks for taking the time to answer my doubts, this info really helped me  (I though that any of your ISOs were compatible with both x86 and 64bit aswell).

I will check for Alpine linux, sounds pretty similar to the minimalist, not systemd just like Artix and Arch, but in the future I want to try Artix, do you think it would run in a raspberry pi?

By the way, I had never tried before to contact any distro community or  support, but I'm glad to see you guys are really commited to help the users.

Thanks again

MAC


________________________________
De: Vitor Sonoki
Enviado: Lunes, 27 de Enero de 2025 07:15 PM
Para: ALFONSO CAPILLA RODRIGUEZ
CC: artix-general at artixlinux.org
Asunto: Re: [artix-general] any recommended ISO for a 32bit

Hey there.

> I would like to try Artix in a 32bit intel machine and tried to get
> into your old ISO archive but the link is broken, is there any Artix
> base ISO better for this ?

If you're looking for distros with first-class 32-bit architecture
support, sadly, the number of choices is diminishing for Linux.

It looks like Artix itself doesn't support it[1], and neither does Arch
officially either (there is a community effort [2] to make 32-bit Arch
Linux, but it's doesn't seem endorsed by the main distro).

> I'm a linux user for more than 10 years, I have installed several
> linux distros since then (always graphical), but now I starting to
> get deeper into linux, I've been learning more about the terminal and
> commands so I think I'm ready to install Arch or some OS pretty
> closed to it.

If you're looking for something like Artix but still runnable on
32-bit x86 hardware, and don't fear doing work in the terminal, I
recommend you to try the following:

 - Alpine Linux: independent non-systemd distribution with fairly
   up-to-date packages and kernel (still not rolling release). The
   environment is pretty minimal, a-la vanilla Artix/Arch, but
   installation is much simpler (script-based). x86 support is first
   class.
 - Devuan: also non-systemd, based off of Debian. The stable release
   lags considerably behind the latest, but you could run the
   "unstable" channel (Ceres) for that - it's much less unstable
   than you'd think. Note that the Debian project itself has decided to
   slowly sunset 32-bit x86 into the future, but it's still supported.
 - If you're open to trying something that's not Linux, most if not all
   BSDs still support x86 first-class.

Hope this helps you. It's a real pity how x86 is slowly being sunset
everywhere. I, too, have a machine on that architecture with less and
less choices available...

Yours,

Vitor S
PGP: 50AADBDE09EF8744BA333E607A4E71A737168122
https://vitorsonoki.github.io

----

[1] https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,405.0.html
[2] https://archlinux32.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20250128/1485a5b6/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the artix-general mailing list