[artix-general] any recommended ISO for a 32bit

[Stephen Wiley]

The reason I use Arch is because I wanted a binary distro that used
GlibC and OpenRC for init. I was using Alpine before but the LibC means
most binaries don't work and even some open source stuff doesn't. As a
bonus because it uses Arch's package manager most AURs work without the
need for a chroot.

So for me, the "why" for Artix is OpenRC support.

-- Stephen

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 08:08:55PM +0000, ALFONSO CAPILLA RODRIGUEZ wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I'm a linux user for more than 10 years, I have installed several linux distros since then (always graphical), but now I starting to get deeper into linux, I've been learning more about the terminal and commands so I think I'm ready to install Arch or some OS pretty closed to it.
> 
> First I read that Artix is based in Arch but better, How similar is Artix to Arch? and which are the more significant differences? I mean, why would someone would like more Artix over Arch?
> 
> I would like to try Artix in a 32bit intel machine and tried to get into your old ISO archive but the link is broken, is there any Artix base ISO better for this ?
> 
> Thank you for your service to the community  and your response to my questions.

> -- 
> artix-general mailing list
> artix-general at artixlinux.org
> https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general