sequoia-octopus-librnp-git is now in galaxy
On 9/5/23 09:37, Javier wrote:
> On 9/5/23 01:24, Javier wrote:
>> On 9/5/23 00:17, artist wrote:
>>> It seems an announcement should be made about the latest changes.
>>>
>>> This is from the last update in
>>> https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,5488.0.html
>>>
>>> Some clarifications:
>>>
>>> /- the galaxy.db error whas caused by a build server issue; we're
>>> going to make this setup more robust to prevent this
>>> - the build server issue was caused by a problem that occurs when
>>> building librewolf 116 or higher, hence this will no longer be done
>>> *- the universe repo is obsolete now, as it has been replaced by
>>> the galaxy repo
>>> - the omniverse repo will remain as it was and is, though some of
>>> its packages will be moved to the galaxy repo*
>>> - the ungoogled-chromium discrepancy will be fixed asap now the
>>> server issue has been fixed
>>> - the -bin packages have been removed, but these can be built locally/
>>>
>>> The following is eg from the pacman.conf in the gtk weekly iso:
>>>
>>> /#[galaxy-gremlins]
>>> #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
>>>
>>> [galaxy]
>>> Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
>>> ...
>>>
>>> # Omniverse contains packages from the AUR and Arch [community],
>>> some with non-free licenses.
>>> # You *must* agree to their license in order to use them.
>>> # Packages and descriptions: http://omniverse.artixlinux.org/x86_64/
>>> [omniverse]
>>> Server = https://eu-mirror.artixlinux.org/omniverse/$arch
>>> Server = https://omniverse.artixlinux.org/$arch
>>> Server = https://artix.sakamoto.pl/omniverse/$arch/
>>>
>>> The license part does no longer apply I think, but I need to verify
>>> this first.
>>>
>>> artist
>>
>>
>> Ohh thanks !
>>
>> BTW, galaxy was giving errors before, but not now. So I should
>> comment out universe.
>>
>> I didn't understand part of your comment on librewolf. Trying to
>> confirm if it's a matter of waiting for version which builds, or a
>> matter of waiting for the build issues to get fixed at a later time,
>> or if it got actually dropped. The later for sure would be really
>> unfortunate for me, since that's the browser I use.
>
> Also, what about sequoia-octopus-librnp[-git] packages? These
> sequoia-octopus-librnp were definitely gone, when removing universe.
> Are they moving to omniverse later? librewolf is still on galaxy
> fortunately...
>
>
More information about the artix-general
mailing list