From somenxavier at posteo.net Thu Feb 2 15:31:12 2023 From: somenxavier at posteo.net (Xavier B.) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:31:12 +0000 Subject: [artix-general] librewolf Message-ID: <20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93@posteo.net> I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? Thanks in advance, Xavier [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ From artist at artixlinux.org Thu Feb 2 20:23:03 2023 From: artist at artixlinux.org (artist) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:23:03 +0100 Subject: [artix-general] librewolf In-Reply-To: <20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93@posteo.net> References: <20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93@posteo.net> Message-ID: <2c1ee6e5-4e4a-100f-750d-bc7a285e67d5@artixlinux.org> I had already tried, but the build failed. Since half a year it fails more often than it succeeds, and firedragon has become even worse. Alternative ungoogled-chromium usually builds OK, and hence can be kept up-to-date. artist On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free On 2/2/23 15:31, Xavier B. wrote: > I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? > > On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? > > > Thanks in advance, > Xavier > > [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ From somenxavier at posteo.net Thu Feb 2 22:12:21 2023 From: somenxavier at posteo.net (Xavier B.) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 21:12:21 +0000 Subject: [artix-general] librewolf In-Reply-To: <2c1ee6e5-4e4a-100f-750d-bc7a285e67d5@artixlinux.org> References: <20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93@posteo.net> <2c1ee6e5-4e4a-100f-750d-bc7a285e67d5@artixlinux.org> Message-ID: <20230202221221.12564d30a7f9b56e53d19c60@posteo.net> Sorry. Perhaps I express myself wrongly. I just wonder what we have older version of librewolf in Artix repos. Thanks, artist, for your compilation efforts. On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:23:03 +0100 artist ha escrit: > I had already tried, but the build failed. Since half a year it fails > more often than it succeeds, and firedragon has become even worse. > Alternative ungoogled-chromium usually builds OK, and hence can be kept > up-to-date. > > artist > > On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free > > On 2/2/23 15:31, Xavier B. wrote: > > I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? > > > > On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Xavier > > > > [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ > > -- > artix-general mailing list > artix-general at artixlinux.org > https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general From charliebrownau at protonmail.com Thu Feb 2 23:16:08 2023 From: charliebrownau at protonmail.com (charliebrownau) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:16:08 +0000 Subject: [artix-general] artix-general Digest, Vol 45, Issue 1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Gday Is it really the worse thing in the world that Librewolf isnt available on the very latest build ? Do we really need to upgrade and change so frequent ? Im using Librewolf v105.3 appimage ( https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/24386000/packages/generic/librewolf/105.0.3-1/LibreWolf.x86_64.AppImage ) all the websites work fine If people wanted the very latest , you can grab the appimage from https://gitlab.com/librewolf-community/browser/appimage/-/releases eg https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/24386000/packages/generic/librewolf/109.0-1/LibreWolf.x86_64.AppImage I personally found issues with one of the latest Delta Chat builds and had to go back until two more verisons was released and give the 3rd one a go Im finding lately the 'latest' often is Buggy Broken Crashy injected ((( RUST))) or ((( PYTHON ))) suddendly spends on ((( Subvertd ))) ,((( dbus ))) , ((( policykit ))) , etc Sometimes its better to keep non OS files long term just works (stable) rather then the latest shiney I can understand needing new files for production server or patching security flaws , but most of the desktop programs seem to work well as an appimage without changing it for months at a time ... A great example of the newest is worst is XFCE XFCE 4.16 was a downgrade and infected it with CSD and the 'latest' 4.18 is aweful I would rather 4.14 or 4.15 as everyone worked fine, for me duel monitors, different wallpapers and freesync all worked on the older builds Do we really need the 'latest thing' Something to consider All the best have a good weekend Regards Charliebrownau charliebrownau at protonmail.com Sent with Proton Mail secure email. ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, February 2nd, 2023 at 9:12 PM, artix-general-request at artixlinux.org wrote: > Send artix-general mailing list submissions to > artix-general at artixlinux.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > artix-general-request at artixlinux.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > artix-general-owner at artixlinux.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of artix-general digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: FYI: Thunderbird 102.7 not able to authenticate to > enterprise 0365 (depends on admin actions) (artist) > 2. Re: Thunderbird (world) 102.7 breaks sequoia-octopus-librnp > (universe) 1.4.1-2 (Javier) > 3. Re: linux 6.1.4.artix1-1 crashes with usb MediaTek mt7612u, > 6.0.12.artix1-1 works just fine (Javier) > 4. Re: linux 6.1.4.artix1-1 crashes with usb MediaTek mt7612u, > 6.0.12.artix1-1 works just fine (Xavier B.) > 5. librewolf (Xavier B.) > 6. Re: librewolf (artist) > 7. Re: librewolf (Xavier B.) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:17:59 +0100 > From: artist artist at artixlinux.org > > To: Javier je-vv at e.email, artix-general > > artix-general at artixlinux.org > > Subject: Re: [artix-general] FYI: Thunderbird 102.7 not able to > authenticate to enterprise 0365 (depends on admin actions) > Message-ID: 4db21f33-b1a3-17d2-60f5-c58bc0b99b01 at artixlinux.org > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > betterbird-102.7.1-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is now?in omniverse and seems to > work - feedback is welcome > > artist > > -- > > On 1/25/23 01:21, Javier wrote: > > > On 1/24/23 15:26, artist wrote: > > > > > Package betterbird-102.7.1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is now in the > > > omniverse repo, including the MS OAuth2 fix. I'll test the fix myself > > > tomorrow. > > > > > > artist > > > > Hopefully your testing is successful, though these 2 reports: > > > > [1]? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812090 > > [2]? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1810760 > > > > Make me believe the issue is still there, even 102.7.1 was supposed to > > fix the issue.? So [2] was reopened, :(? The last comment on [1] > > before being marked as a duplicate of [2], is that beta should have > > fixed the issue.? It seems we have to wait a bit longer, so far [2] is > > still not under fixed state... > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 18:24:28 -0600 > From: Javier je-vv at e.email > > To: artix-general at artixlinux.org > Subject: Re: [artix-general] Thunderbird (world) 102.7 breaks > sequoia-octopus-librnp (universe) 1.4.1-2 > Message-ID: 89f8cf7c-0da7-418d-2d07-bf83bc039d3a at e.email > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > On 1/23/23 14:01, Javier wrote: > > > Hello Artist, I already tested TB 102.7 with octopus 1.4.1-4, and unfortunately, octopus still remains broken with TB 102.7.? It's working fine with TB 102.6.1-1.? It seems it's upstream then.? I'll look if a new issue on gitlab was filed, and otherwise, I'll report a new one... > > > > Thanks a lot ! > > > FYI: > > https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-octopus-librnp/-/issues/83 > > -- > Javier > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: OpenPGP_signature > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 228 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20230129/22f0745c/attachment-0001.sig > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:14:24 -0600 > From: Javier je-vv at e.email > > To: "Xavier B." somenxavier at posteo.net > > Cc: artix-general artix-general at artixlinux.org > > Subject: Re: [artix-general] linux 6.1.4.artix1-1 crashes with usb > MediaTek mt7612u, 6.0.12.artix1-1 works just fine > Message-ID: 7a511956-8265-27fb-400b-e9592a1bc0c9 at e.email > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > On 1/22/23 08:02, Xavier B. wrote: > > > Perhaps you could install linux-hardened meanwhile (now 6.1.7). > > > > Regards, > > Xavier > > > I've never used linux-hardened, it would be interesting to compare linux source package (PKGBUILD, configs, patches) vs. linux-hardened. One interesting difference is that linux is part of "system", while linux-hardened is part of "world". It's like "core" vs. "extra" on arch. > > That said, linux 6.1.8.artix1-1 is already part of "system", and it came out without the issue. Not sure if that linux version came out already fixed, or if the patch used on 6.1.7 by arch got propagated. The good news is that the artix linux 6.1.8.artix1-1 package works just fine... > > Thanks ! > > -- > Javier > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: OpenPGP_signature > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 228 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20230130/1a590b69/attachment-0001.sig > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 14:50:51 +0000 > From: "Xavier B." somenxavier at posteo.net > > To: Javier je-vv at e.email > > Cc: artix-general artix-general at artixlinux.org > > Subject: Re: [artix-general] linux 6.1.4.artix1-1 crashes with usb > MediaTek mt7612u, 6.0.12.artix1-1 works just fine > Message-ID: 20230131155051.ad611be3a0c2fa2a233c5d9e at posteo.net > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Just a suggestion meanwhile. For not having waiting time. > In Arch wiki in Security page is a good point to start to see the enhancements. I ignore the source comparison. Just a user here. > > Regards, > Xavier > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:14:24 -0600 > Javier je-vv at e.email ha escrit: > > > On 1/22/23 08:02, Xavier B. wrote: > > > > > Perhaps you could install linux-hardened meanwhile (now 6.1.7). > > > > > > Regards, > > > Xavier > > > > I've never used linux-hardened, it would be interesting to compare linux source package (PKGBUILD, configs, patches) vs. linux-hardened. One interesting difference is that linux is part of "system", while linux-hardened is part of "world". It's like "core" vs. "extra" on arch. > > > > That said, linux 6.1.8.artix1-1 is already part of "system", and it came out without the issue. Not sure if that linux version came out already fixed, or if the patch used on 6.1.7 by arch got propagated. The good news is that the artix linux 6.1.8.artix1-1 package works just fine... > > > > Thanks ! > > > > -- > > Javier > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:31:12 +0000 > From: "Xavier B." somenxavier at posteo.net > > To: artix-general at artixlinux.org > Subject: [artix-general] librewolf > Message-ID: 20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93 at posteo.net > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? > > On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? > > > Thanks in advance, > Xavier > > [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:23:03 +0100 > From: artist artist at artixlinux.org > > To: artix-general at artixlinux.org > Subject: Re: [artix-general] librewolf > Message-ID: 2c1ee6e5-4e4a-100f-750d-bc7a285e67d5 at artixlinux.org > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I had already tried, but the build failed. Since half a year it fails > more often than it succeeds, and firedragon has become even worse. > Alternative ungoogled-chromium usually builds OK, and hence can be kept > up-to-date. > > artist > > On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free > > On 2/2/23 15:31, Xavier B. wrote: > > > I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? > > > > On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Xavier > > > > [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 21:12:21 +0000 > From: "Xavier B." somenxavier at posteo.net > > To: artist artist at artixlinux.org > > Cc: artix-general at artixlinux.org > Subject: Re: [artix-general] librewolf > Message-ID: 20230202221221.12564d30a7f9b56e53d19c60 at posteo.net > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Sorry. Perhaps I express myself wrongly. I just wonder what we have older version of librewolf in Artix repos. > > Thanks, artist, for your compilation efforts. > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:23:03 +0100 > artist artist at artixlinux.org ha escrit: > > > I had already tried, but the build failed. Since half a year it fails > > more often than it succeeds, and firedragon has become even worse. > > Alternative ungoogled-chromium usually builds OK, and hence can be kept > > up-to-date. > > > > artist > > > > On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free > > > > On 2/2/23 15:31, Xavier B. wrote: > > > > > I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? > > > > > > On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Xavier > > > > > > [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ > > > > -- > > artix-general mailing list > > artix-general at artixlinux.org > > https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > artix-general mailing list > artix-general at artixlinux.org > https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general > > > ------------------------------ > > End of artix-general Digest, Vol 45, Issue 1 > ******************************************** From artist at artixlinux.org Tue Feb 7 19:05:41 2023 From: artist at artixlinux.org (artist) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 19:05:41 +0100 Subject: [artix-general] FYI: Thunderbird 102.7 not able to authenticate to enterprise 0365 (depends on admin actions) In-Reply-To: <4db21f33-b1a3-17d2-60f5-c58bc0b99b01@artixlinux.org> References: <5b1c9c8c-1331-1a9a-2466-6b633fbe7476@artixlinux.org> <8fb37075-7052-aeca-47e2-44e77e0fc935@e.email> <4db21f33-b1a3-17d2-60f5-c58bc0b99b01@artixlinux.org> Message-ID: <144d8077-f7af-9ffb-44c3-0399243a5f6e@artixlinux.org> The current version?betterbird-102.7.1-7 in omniverse works, also for add-ons like TB-Sync. Intermittent issues seem related to 'fixes' confirmed to break o365 as confirmed by Money$lot here: https://twitter.com/MSFT365Status artist On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free On 1/26/23 12:17, artist wrote: > betterbird-102.7.1-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is now?in omniverse and seems > to work - feedback is welcome > > artist > > -- > > On 1/25/23 01:21, Javier wrote: >> On 1/24/23 15:26, artist wrote: >>> Package betterbird-102.7.1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is now in the >>> omniverse repo, including the MS OAuth2 fix. I'll test the fix >>> myself tomorrow. >>> >>> artist >> >> Hopefully your testing is successful, though these 2 reports: >> >> [1]? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812090 >> [2]? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1810760 >> >> Make me believe the issue is still there, even 102.7.1 was supposed >> to fix the issue.? So [2] was reopened, :(? The last comment on [1] >> before being marked as a duplicate of [2], is that beta should have >> fixed the issue.? It seems we have to wait a bit longer, so far [2] >> is still not under fixed state... >> >> > From artist at artixlinux.org Tue Feb 7 21:29:36 2023 From: artist at artixlinux.org (artist) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 21:29:36 +0100 Subject: [artix-general] librewolf In-Reply-To: <20230202221221.12564d30a7f9b56e53d19c60@posteo.net> References: <20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93@posteo.net> <2c1ee6e5-4e4a-100f-750d-bc7a285e67d5@artixlinux.org> <20230202221221.12564d30a7f9b56e53d19c60@posteo.net> Message-ID: np This time the build succeeded. artist On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free On 2/2/23 22:12, Xavier B. wrote: > Sorry. Perhaps I express myself wrongly. I just wonder what we have older version of librewolf in Artix repos. > > Thanks, artist, for your compilation efforts. > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 20:23:03 +0100 > artist ha escrit: > >> I had already tried, but the build failed. Since half a year it fails >> more often than it succeeds, and firedragon has become even worse. >> Alternative ungoogled-chromium usually builds OK, and hence can be kept >> up-to-date. >> >> artist >> >> On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free >> >> On 2/2/23 15:31, Xavier B. wrote: >>> I see the librewolf package in artix is 108.0.1 but in arch AUR there is 109.0 available. Can someone please upgrade package? >>> >>> On the other hand, following official page [1], it seems there are two versions of librewolf in AUR: librewolf and librewolf-bin. From which artix package is built? >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Xavier >>> >>> [1] https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/ >> -- >> artix-general mailing list >> artix-general at artixlinux.org >> https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general From je-vv at e.email Thu Feb 9 18:36:48 2023 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 11:36:48 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] librewolf In-Reply-To: References: <20230202153112.c69170268c1429dc073bfa93@posteo.net> <2c1ee6e5-4e4a-100f-750d-bc7a285e67d5@artixlinux.org> <20230202221221.12564d30a7f9b56e53d19c60@posteo.net> Message-ID: <006d9400-1ff0-f7e2-da50-47fd1970f40a@e.email> On 2/7/23 14:29, artist wrote: > np > This time the build succeeded. > > artist And it works just fine ! Thanks a lot @artist ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From artist at artixlinux.org Sat Feb 18 19:54:55 2023 From: artist at artixlinux.org (artist) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 19:54:55 +0100 Subject: [artix-general] Thunderbird (world) 102.7 breaks sequoia-octopus-librnp (universe) 1.4.1-2 In-Reply-To: <89f8cf7c-0da7-418d-2d07-bf83bc039d3a@e.email> References: <6a1ee6b9-9299-8bd2-d918-73db62de0bbe@rtx.ksac.uk> <5bf3b1be-d1e2-b954-988d-53c56ac0bf4b@e.email> <89f8cf7c-0da7-418d-2d07-bf83bc039d3a@e.email> Message-ID: <881f640b-1ce7-a126-0fb1-5ee5480427ec@artixlinux.org> sequoia-octopus-librnp-git is now in universe for any testers artist On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free On 1/30/23 01:24, Javier wrote: > On 1/23/23 14:01, Javier wrote: >> Hello Artist, I already tested TB 102.7 with octopus 1.4.1-4, and >> unfortunately, octopus still remains broken with TB 102.7.? It's >> working fine with TB 102.6.1-1.? It seems it's upstream then.? I'll >> look if a new issue on gitlab was filed, and otherwise, I'll report a >> new one... >> >> Thanks a lot ! > > FYI: > > https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-octopus-librnp/-/issues/83 > > From je-vv at e.email Sat Feb 18 23:50:24 2023 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 16:50:24 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] Thunderbird (world) 102.7 breaks sequoia-octopus-librnp (universe) 1.4.1-2 In-Reply-To: <881f640b-1ce7-a126-0fb1-5ee5480427ec@artixlinux.org> References: <6a1ee6b9-9299-8bd2-d918-73db62de0bbe@rtx.ksac.uk> <5bf3b1be-d1e2-b954-988d-53c56ac0bf4b@e.email> <89f8cf7c-0da7-418d-2d07-bf83bc039d3a@e.email> <881f640b-1ce7-a126-0fb1-5ee5480427ec@artixlinux.org> Message-ID: <4e30bc12-6725-ef69-25e3-f18be71bf9e0@e.email> On 2/18/23 12:54, artist wrote: > sequoia-octopus-librnp-git is now in universe for any testers > > artist Working fine with up to date TB (102.7.2-1). Thanks a lot @artist -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From je-vv at e.email Tue Feb 21 07:18:50 2023 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:18:50 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] FYI: Thunderbird 102.7 not able to authenticate to enterprise 0365 (depends on admin actions) In-Reply-To: <144d8077-f7af-9ffb-44c3-0399243a5f6e@artixlinux.org> References: <5b1c9c8c-1331-1a9a-2466-6b633fbe7476@artixlinux.org> <8fb37075-7052-aeca-47e2-44e77e0fc935@e.email> <4db21f33-b1a3-17d2-60f5-c58bc0b99b01@artixlinux.org> <144d8077-f7af-9ffb-44c3-0399243a5f6e@artixlinux.org> Message-ID: On 2/7/23 12:05, artist wrote: > The current version?betterbird-102.7.1-7 in omniverse works, also for add-ons like TB-Sync. > Intermittent issues seem related to 'fixes' confirmed to break o365 as confirmed by Money$lot here: https://twitter.com/MSFT365Status > > artist Just to confirm, I'm using latest 102.7.2-1 TB Artix version, and it's working fine, as before authentication got broken. Actually I added to "TBSync" + "Provider for Exchange ActiveSync", "Category Manager" from the same set of extensions. However even with that combo, I didn't get "Contacts" to actually work for me. It wasn't working before, I was just waiting that perhaps with "Category Manager" addition, those enterprise contacts would show up, :( Is there any other solution, apart from TBSync and company, plus perhaps davmail, that anyone is aware to work fine with enterprise o365? This is apparently a known issue, according to [1] and [2]. -- Javier [1] https://github.com/jobisoft/EAS-4-TbSync/issues/213 [2] https://github.com/jobisoft/TbSync/issues/620 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From je-vv at e.email Mon Feb 27 08:18:35 2023 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 01:18:35 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] thunar reporting no gvs on wayland/wayfire Message-ID: <0919bd54-b987-e039-e6e1-67aa718af321@e.email> Hi ! For those using thunar or nemo under wayland, but not through gnome neither kde, do you know how to make them work with gvfs. On thunar, at least on advanced preferences I can see a big note on yellow warning about the lack of gvfs. On Xorg, with LXQt, thunar doesn't complain at all, and show the trash, and the FS correctly, of course no warnings about gvfs on the advanced preferences. I have gvfs and a bunch of its plugins already installed. An alternative is using nautilus, but it's not respecting $GDK_DPI_SCALE env var, and the gsettings for gnome do not work, so I can't really read the tiny letters. But it does show the trash, so I guess no problems with it. Any one using a gui file manager, hopefully gtk, with gvfs, under wayland, and working fine? Thanks ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From doletov.fyodor at yandex.ru Tue Feb 28 13:22:44 2023 From: doletov.fyodor at yandex.ru (=?utf-8?B?0JTQvtC70LXRgtC+0LIg0KTRkdC00L7RgA==?=) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:22:44 +0300 Subject: [artix-general] Broken prometheus-openrc package Message-ID: <236651677586591@mail.yandex.ru> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: