From je-vv at e.email Wed Oct 5 22:52:17 2022 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:52:17 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] python-pyqt6 upgrade issue Message-ID: <923b8d82-3f20-d524-2996-42d12f9c0c1f@e.email> After 2 days back upgrade, there's this error whenever trying to upgrade again: > (1/1) checking for file conflicts [########################################################] 100% > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) > python-pyqt6: /bin exists in filesystem (owned by filesystem) > python-pyqt6: /bin/pylupdate6 exists in filesystem > python-pyqt6: /bin/pyuic6 exists in filesystem > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Now, I don't know if python-pyqt6 should be installed to fix the issue, but it gives exactly the same: > % pacman -S python-pyqt6 > resolving dependencies... > looking for conflicting packages... > > Packages (1) python-pyqt6-6.4.0-1 > > Total Installed Size: 26.58 MiB > Net Upgrade Size: 0.31 MiB > > :: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] > (1/1) checking keys in keyring [########################################################] 100% > (1/1) checking package integrity [########################################################] 100% > (1/1) loading package files [########################################################] 100% > (1/1) checking for file conflicts [########################################################] 100% > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) > python-pyqt6: /bin exists in filesystem (owned by filesystem) > python-pyqt6: /bin/pylupdate6 exists in filesystem > python-pyqt6: /bin/pyuic6 exists in filesystem > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. So, something bad happened with a prior upgrade, and I'm not sure if python-pyqt6 is having a packaging issue then... Greetings ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From je-vv at e.email Thu Oct 6 07:00:34 2022 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:00:34 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] python-pyqt6 upgrade issue In-Reply-To: <923b8d82-3f20-d524-2996-42d12f9c0c1f@e.email> References: <923b8d82-3f20-d524-2996-42d12f9c0c1f@e.email> Message-ID: On 10/5/22 14:52, Javier wrote: > After 2 days back upgrade, there's this error whenever trying to upgrade again: > >> (1/1) checking for file conflicts?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? [########################################################] 100% >> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) >> python-pyqt6: /bin exists in filesystem (owned by filesystem) >> python-pyqt6: /bin/pylupdate6 exists in filesystem >> python-pyqt6: /bin/pyuic6 exists in filesystem >> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. Issue now solved with most recent update Today... -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From je-vv at e.email Tue Oct 18 21:49:23 2022 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:49:23 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] [universe] thunderbird 102.2.0 broke sequoia-octopus-librnp 1.4.0 and TbSync ext (and the exchange provider ext) In-Reply-To: References: <7fac6843-7e7f-231c-3558-3e0170337c2f@e.email> <25c44479-fbff-ab50-3be0-db280c4c8ce5@artixlinux.org> Message-ID: <88825540-a301-627c-789d-74632849b445@e.email> FYI, besides @artist being kind enough of providing new sequoia-octopus-librnp, compatible with 100s TB versions, and also backward compatible, now TbSync and companion "provider for exchange" are working with 102.3+ TB versions. Although calendar and contacts sync is working, looking for contacts is not, but it's slowly coming. The other companion "category manager" is not ported yet, perhaps that's affecting contacts... So, at this point, at least I don't have to keep TB version frozen at 91.12.0-1 anymore, :) Thanks a lot @artist, to me sequoia-octopus-librnp is what has kept me using TB ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From je-vv at e.email Sat Oct 29 05:15:00 2022 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:15:00 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] [omniverse] librewolf still maintained? Message-ID: Hello ! I'm wondering if librewolf is still maintained under unofficial omniverse. 105.0.3 and 106.0.1 are already released, but librewolf on omniverse got stuck at 105.0.1. Not making any request, just wondering. AFAIK building librewolf is a real PITA. So it might be it's taking much longer to get the latest version to build, hehe... I'm OK waiting for when available, since I do prefer it built with artix libs, rather than builds from even non Arch based distros, just trying to understand if it makes sense to wait or not, :) Thanks a lot ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From somenxavier at posteo.net Sat Oct 29 09:43:39 2022 From: somenxavier at posteo.net (Xavier B.) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 07:43:39 +0000 Subject: [artix-general] [omniverse] librewolf still maintained? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20221029094339.20b7008e85eb20a133d5c977@posteo.net> I don't know, Javier, if it's maintained or not. I'm user of that too. In old times, I used arch AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/librewolf-bin We would have this option if it is not maintained anymore. Thanks, On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:15:00 -0600 Javier ha escrit: > Hello ! > > I'm wondering if librewolf is still maintained under unofficial omniverse. 105.0.3 and 106.0.1 are already released, but librewolf on omniverse got stuck at 105.0.1. Not making any request, just wondering. AFAIK building librewolf is a real PITA. So it might be it's taking much longer to get the latest version to build, hehe... I'm OK waiting for when available, since I do prefer it built with artix libs, rather than builds from even non Arch based distros, just trying to understand if it makes sense to wait or not, :) > > Thanks a lot ! > > -- > Javier From je-vv at e.email Sat Oct 29 13:08:05 2022 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 05:08:05 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] [omniverse] librewolf still maintained? In-Reply-To: <20221029094339.20b7008e85eb20a133d5c977@posteo.net> References: <20221029094339.20b7008e85eb20a133d5c977@posteo.net> Message-ID: On 10/29/22 01:43, Xavier B. wrote: > I don't know, Javier, if it's maintained or not. > I'm user of that too. > > In old times, I used arch AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/librewolf-bin > We would have this option if it is not maintained anymore. Yup, I used librewolf-bin, before I realized it was part of omniverse, :). Hopefully it's still maintained, since *-bin are built probably with different libs and such... Thanks ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From somenxavier at posteo.net Sat Oct 29 14:36:33 2022 From: somenxavier at posteo.net (Xavier B.) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 12:36:33 +0000 Subject: [artix-general] [omniverse] librewolf still maintained? In-Reply-To: References: <20221029094339.20b7008e85eb20a133d5c977@posteo.net> Message-ID: <20221029143633.4634facc295c5aff3afdbaaa@posteo.net> Right now a version 106.0.1-1 is appeared in omniverse Xavier On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 05:08:05 -0600 Javier ha escrit: > On 10/29/22 01:43, Xavier B. wrote: > > I don't know, Javier, if it's maintained or not. > > I'm user of that too. > > > > In old times, I used arch AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/librewolf-bin > > We would have this option if it is not maintained anymore. > > Yup, I used librewolf-bin, before I realized it was part of omniverse, :). Hopefully it's still maintained, since *-bin are built probably with different libs and such... Thanks ! > > -- > Javier > From je-vv at e.email Sun Oct 30 02:31:20 2022 From: je-vv at e.email (Javier) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 19:31:20 -0600 Subject: [artix-general] [omniverse] librewolf still maintained? In-Reply-To: <20221029143633.4634facc295c5aff3afdbaaa@posteo.net> References: <20221029094339.20b7008e85eb20a133d5c977@posteo.net> <20221029143633.4634facc295c5aff3afdbaaa@posteo.net> Message-ID: On 10/29/22 06:36, Xavier B. wrote: > Right now a version 106.0.1-1 is appeared in omniverse Yes, many thanks ! -- Javier -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: