Hi Javier,
No packages have been dropped from the universe repo lately, but for
some reason they are no longer found in it's database. Re-adding seems
to fix this but as I continued to find packages with this problem I have
now added all packages back again. If the problems persists I'll rebuild
the database from scratch.
The packages you mention should be available right now, and we will keep
updating them as usual.
The whole universe remains for all of us.
You might also find some useful packages in the omniverse repo as in
https://wiki.artixlinux.org/Main/Repositories#Unofficial_User_Repositories
Regards,
artist
--
On a bended knee, or systemd, you will never live free
On 11/30/21 22:02, Javier wrote:
>> % pacman -Qmq autofs
>> autofs-s6
>> librewolf
>> sequoia-octopus-librnp
>> thunderbird-artix
>> tor-browser
>> ungoogled-chromium
>
> As universe is not official, I guess this is normal. I believe most
> of them can be found on AUR (well thunderbird from arch extra),
> although it's not the same to use a distro built package, with the
> distro own libraries ans such, than a binary generated from and for
> another distro, which is what usually happens with *-bin packages on
> AUR, if not wanting to build huge packages, such as librewolf. The
> exceptions are autofs-s6 and sequoia-octopus-librnp, which I don't see
> available on AUR.
>
> Although I'd like a non systemd distto to provide autofs, and its
> service package (in my case autofs-s6), given I don't find equivalent
> non systemd SW, I can get away with the AUR autofs, but I'm still
> missing autofs-s6. The sequoia-octopus-librnp package I know is sort
> of a special case, but I really liked it compared to what TB provides,
> which I really dislike.
>
> Where can I grab the last versions of autofs-s6 and
> sequoia-octopus-librnp pacman packages (PKGBUILD and company)? And do
> you know, at least for the sequoia-octopus-librnp, how to find out
> about new versions?
>
> It's sad to see those packages dropped, but I guess their maintainers
> are too busy to keep an eye on them. I'll really miss them, specially
> the two ones I mentioned not having AUR equivalents.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
More information about the artix-general
mailing list