[artix-general] Musl libc as systems libc

[Chris Cromer]

https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html
http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html

On 4/29/21 7:21 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:13:01PM -0400, Chris Cromer wrote:
>> That is not really within the scope of this project. We follow arch
>> linux, and arch linux is a glibc distro. To be able to offer musl
>> would require recompiling 100% of the packages against musl and
>> honestly that is a giant task and far beyond anything we have the
>> manpower to do.
>>
>> Would it be cool? Yes. Is it doable? No.
> 
> What would we get with using Musl?
> 
>>
>> On 4/23/21 8:25 AM, Delta Echo wrote:
>>> Is there any interest in making Musl the systems libc?
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Chris Cromer
>> Artix Developer
> 
> [-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -- 
>> artix-general mailing list
>> artix-general at artixlinux.org
>> https://lists.artixlinux.org/listinfo/artix-general
> 
> 

-- 
Chris Cromer
Artix Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xFA91071797BEEEC2.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 42036 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20210501/bb964474/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20210501/bb964474/attachment-0001.sig>