[artix-general] Pacman Upgrade strangeness

Juraj Oravec sgorava at artixlinux.org
Thu Jan 2 12:38:48 CET 2020


On štvrtok 2. januára 2020 9:18:19 CET Ruben Safir wrote:
> Is there a reason why python broke?  I'm just curious and I will
> probably learn something if I understood why.

I believe upstream changes within pyqt5.

Which were reflected in Arch packages.
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/
pyqt5&id=bd544723e6262bc978d4a7680eedeef90186dc41

https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/
pyqt5&id=314215fd73f4d6b296393712e885eca102343a70

You can see the list of all changes at:
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/
pyqt5

That is all I know about this problem, if you have more question about 
it please go and and ask Mr. Antonio Rojas at <arojas at archlinux.org> who 
made these changes in Archlinux, or ask the pyqt5 developers.

And why pacman did not manage to perform update, well lets ask some 
pacman guru because I see it as failure.

Best regards.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.artixlinux.org/archives/artix-general/attachments/20200102/3c22c8f9/attachment.sig>


More information about the artix-general mailing list