Yes. Javier I'm with you: I prefer pandoc-bin name because it's could be confused with typical pandoc package
Xavier
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 20:48:41 -0600
Javier via artix-general <artix-general at artixlinux.org> ha escrit:
> >> pandoc-bin is under AUR, but a few weeks back it was added to the artix repos. On Today's upgrade, it seems it was removed from the artix repos.
> >>
> >> No issue with that, but I'm wondering if that's permanent, or a glitch, and then now I move to use AUR back again, or I should wait for the package to come back to the artix repos?
>
> BTW, it's still on the artix repos, but was renamed to plain pandoc. Which really confused me as well as the haskell-pandoc-crossref-bin package from AUR. The AUR pandoc-crossref-bin package is expecting pandoc-bin, not plain pandoc... If you'd ask me, I'd preferred to keep pandoc-bin as the name, since that's the package being installed, but I can deal with the name change I'd guess, changing the AUR package on every update it has...
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> Javier
More information about the artix-general
mailing list